|
Help billymabrey.com | |||||
|
|
Johann Heinrich Schulze while attempting to repeat an experiment in 1727, accidentally used impure compounds and ended up with a strange substance that darkened in the sun's light but did not darken with heat. He published his result and people all over Europe repeated his experiments in fascination. Thomas Wedgwood used Schulze's compound and spread it upon paper and leather and made sun prints of things like leaves. However, much to his dismay, the amazing records of shadows and light were fleeting, eventually darkening as more light exposed them over time with no way known of stopping it other then hiding the prints away in eternal darkness. Attempts were even made to capture the camera obscura image, with little or no success. The pieces were in place for photography to be born. If only there were a way to permanently brand lights image onto paper. Nicephor Niepce finally did it 100 years later in 1827 with his process of the Heliograph. Soon after many other ways of recording images of light were discovered by Daguerre and Sir Henry Fox Talbot. In 1838, Mungo Ponton in a variation of Talbot's techniques found that the chemical Potassium Bichromate became less soluble in water with further exposure to light. Fox Talbot had noted that organic colloids (things like gelatin and gum arabic) also became insoluble when mixed with the dichromate and exposed to sunlight. Alphonse Louis Poitevin realized in 1855 that pigment mixed with the colloid, Gum Arabic, would be trapped in the resulting insoluble material, and permanently attached to the paper. Other colloids used were egg whites and gelatin. Gum Bichromate printing was born as a permanent way of keeping light.
Robert Demachy introduced his gum prints in Paris in 1894. They caused something of a fiasco among the critics on the qualification of gum prints as being photography. Critics said that there was too much of the artists hand, and gum printing resembled more drawing and painting then photography. Demachy insisted otherwise, claiming to be the exact opposite of a painter. Painters add pigment with the brush, he himself merely removes pigment to reveal the image the camera had recorded. Fredrick Evans, a photographer in stark opposition to Demachy's practice insisted,
In retort, Demachy said that an artist copying nature, whether by pencil or camera, was not making art. He thought it ridiculous that it was ok to tamper with the lens of the camera for artistic purpose, but it was taboo to touch the print. There was nothing wrong with working the print itself, combining different elements, destroying or emphasizing others. "The end justifies the means." Demachy declared, with a phrase still heard today. In the end, Gum printing succumbed to the straight photography movement and slipped away into alternative process stature, among so many other processes. Alfred Stieglitz, Paul Strand, Edward Steichen, and later Imogen Cunningham, Edward Weston, Ansel Adams, and others made photography its own art, no longer standing in the shadows of painting. It was a new art of almost perfect detail, where the subject and the observer mattered seemingly more then the artists craft, hidden beneath the remarkable detail their images showcased. The silver gelatin medium took hold as the standard, and the explosion of older photographic mediums faded away into history books. In the 1970's photographers began to re-discover many historical
processes. Some were easy enough to find their way into photography
classrooms over the years. Silver gelatin negatives made in the darkroom
(as opposed to glass negatives) made the gum bichromate process
even easier than it once was during the 19th century.With the coming of the space-age,
electronic devices to capture light slowly trickled into the public's
hands. Video cameras were the first, and as the internet grew and people
found a new standard device, the computer, in their homes. Photography
took the leap and has become almost entirely an electronic digital medium.
Today, Gum printing and other alternative processes can blend seamlessly with digital technology. Artists and photographers can use digital printing to create negative transparencies to use with these historical processes like Gum printing. No more glass plates or tedious darkroom replication is involved. Gum printing however still retains the original had crafted magic it once had, in spite of its marriage to digital technologies. I can attest: making a gum print feels very different then pressing a few buttons. This is what photography always was, mixing the old technologies with the new. It is from old ideas that we make new ones. If you see what has come before you, and create art from that, by whatever means, it will always justify the end. --Billy Mabrey 07/01/2006 Quotes and information from The History Of Photography by Beaumont Newhall. |
||||||||||||
| <<< Previous Next >>> | |||||||||||||
|